Self-evaluation

Presentation: 7
I agree with my classmates who think that, that day I was too nervous, because I didn't prepare it enough maybe... But for my surprise It was been better than I was thought in a first moment. However, finally I decided to do it, as a result, too many stops. My other problem was that I didn't see the people, perhaps because If I had seen them, I would have been too nervous.

Body language: 7
Well, my levels in English didn't let me to use high vocabulary, however I used the specific words about my research issue like reactive plaster, needle and others. In general good, but I think it would be better.

Structure: 7
Sincerely, the order of explanation was the correct, but instead the video I could have broght the material to pick up myself for example to explain better the method which diabetics still everyday. Definitely I have a 7 too in this part because I think I could have done different.

Content: nearly 30
Here it doesn't depends on my the mark, because maybe there were a variety of opinions about content. It depends on every person and if he likes the topic.

Language: 14
In my opinion I never use high language like other classmates, and it is a problem because in this case if I don't learn high vocabulary I won't improve my level and instead of good marks there will be normal marks. However, before every oral presnetation I revise the links.

Pronunciation:6
Well in this apart a lot of people have problems except natives and other good students. I don't have a matture pronunciation yet but I think it was good than other times. Sonia said me the words that I didn't said good and If my memory doesn't lie me, they are "hereditary", "issue", "characterized" and "prova" thats it is prove or test.

To conclude, maybe I put myself a high mark, but in my opinion the oral was better than the first.

Sorry people, for the moment I don t put the video but I am trying to do it.